91 Enterprise, LLC v. Body Frenzy, Inc. et al
| 91 Enterprises, LLC and 91 Enterprise, LLC |
| Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Does 1 through 30, inclusive, Almog Gerbi and Does 1-30 inclusive |
| 2:2018cv09118 |
| October 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Steve Kim |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court. (mrgo) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC 718717. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Almog Gerbi, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #7 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 , Jury Demand #8 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #2 , Declaration #5 , Declaration #4 served on October 24, 2018. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (esa) |
| Filing 8 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendants Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Almog Gerbi.. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Almog Gerbi, (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Body Frenzy, Inc. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 5 DECLARATION of Almog Gerbi re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #2 filed by Defendant Almog Gerbi. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Daniel Arie re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #2 filed by Defendant Daniel Arie. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Almog Gerbi. (Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles County Superior Court, case number BC718717 Receipt No: 0973-22632335 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Almog Gerbi, Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons packet, #3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Case Management Conference) (Attorney Nabil A Bisharat added to party Daniel Arie(pty:dft), Attorney Nabil A Bisharat added to party Body Frenzy, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Nabil A Bisharat added to party Almog Gerbi(pty:dft))(Bisharat, Nabil) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Daniel Arie, Body Frenzy, Inc., Does 1-30 inclusive, Almog Gerbi, filed by plaintiff 91 Enterprise, LLC. (Filed in state court 8/21/18, submitted as document 2, attachment 1) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
