John Doe v. California Institute of Technology, et al
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive and California Institute of Technology
Case Number: 2:2018cv09178
Filed: October 25, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: Jean P Rosenbluth
2 Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 17, 2018 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant California Institute of Technology, (Krumbein, Vanessa)
December 17, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant California Institute of Technology. Motion set for hearing on 1/28/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Vanessa C. Krumbein, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Vanessa C Krumbein added to party California Institute of Technology(pty:dft)) (Krumbein, Vanessa)
December 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than December 28, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of summons and complaint (applicable for defendant(s) who have not been served); In cases removed from State Court, responsive pleadings filed by all defendants; Request for entry of default by plaintiff(s) (applicable where defendants have been served but not answered); Motion for default judgment. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. (lom)
November 21, 2018 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Doe, upon Defendant California Institute of Technology served on 11/15/2018, answer due 12/6/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Stuart Tochner - Attorney for Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Azat, Michael)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-09178 SVW(JEMx). (rn)
November 2, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
November 2, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa)
November 2, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #3 as to defendant California Institute of Technology. (esa)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 SEALED COMPLAINT against defendants California Institute of Technology, Does 1-20, inclusive. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth.(Filing fee $ 400 paid), Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff John Doe. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (esa)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: granting #1 APPLICATION to file Complaint and Notice of Interested Parties under seal and to proceed under pseudonyms (esa)
October 25, 2018 Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff John Doe, Application to File Complaint and Notice of Interested Parties Under Seal, (see attachment) served on 6/14/18. (esa)
October 25, 2018 Filing 1 APPLICATION to to Seal Complaint and Notice of Interested Parties and to poceed under pseudonyms filed by plaintiff John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Proposed Order) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Doe v. California Institute of Technology, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-20, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Institute of Technology
Represented By: Vanessa C Krumbein
Represented By: Stuart Douglas Tochner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Michael O Azat
Represented By: Issa Y Azat, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?