Chris Langer v. William Harvey et al
| Chris Langer |
| Does 1-10, Chao Krung Corporation and William Harvey |
| 2:2018cv09188 |
| October 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant William Harvey.(Stein, Steven) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: Request for Entry of Default as to Defendant Chao Krung Corporation, a California Corporation #13 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Time to respond has not expired. A Stipulation was filed on 12/17/2018, extending the time for defendant Chao Krung Corporation to respond to 1/9/2019. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. (gk) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Chao Krung Corporation answer now due 1/9/2018, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Chao Krung Corporation.(Attorney Laurie M Cortez added to party Chao Krung Corporation(pty:dft))(Cortez, Laurie) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Chao Krung Corporation filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of Service) (Grace, Phyl) |
| Filing 12 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant William Harvey.(Attorney Steven A Stein added to party William Harvey(pty:dft))(Stein, Steven) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant Chao Krung Corporation served on 11/17/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe -Person In-charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant William Harvey served on 11/7/2018, answer due 11/28/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon in individual and representative capacity as trustee in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cb) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendants Chao Krung Corporation, William Harvey. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22645061 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
