Matthew Marshall v. Hat World Inc. et al
Matthew Marshall |
Hat World Inc., DOES 1 through 50, inclusive. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
2:2018cv09222 |
October 26, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Manuel L Real |
Gail J Standish |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Manuel L. Real: Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal filed April 19, 2019 (Dkt. No. #12 ), this action is hereby dismissed. All dates are hereby vacated and off calendar, and the Clerk's Office is directed to close this case Made JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1) filed by Defendant Hat World Inc..(Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 11 ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) SETTING PRE-TRIAL & TRIAL DATES by Judge Manuel L. Real. COUNSEL ARE NOTIFIED that this action is hereby placed on calendar for FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE on JULY 8, 2019 AT 11:00 A.M. Memoranda of Contentions of Fact and Law, Exhibit Lists and Witness Lists shall be filed and served on or before JUNE 17, 2019, which date will also serve as the discovery cut-off date in this action. There is no Motion Cut-Off Date set. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER shall be lodged with this Court on or before JULY 1, 2019. BENCH TRIAL DATE is set as AUGUST 6, 2019 AT 9:00 A.M. IT IS SO ORDERED. (cch) |
Filing 10 COUNTERCLAIM against Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Matthew Marshall, filed by Defendant and Counter-claimant Hat World Inc..(Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Defendant Hat World Inc... (Matar, Monique) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hat World Inc., of Order Re: Notice to Counsel (Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE: NOTICE TO COUNSEL upon filing of the complaint by Judge Manuel L. Real. READ CAREFULLY - FAILURE TO COMPLY MAY LEAD TO SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (cch) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Hat World Inc., served on October 29, 2018. (Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS'S COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Hat World Inc. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/26/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO B TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.2 #1 .(et) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Hat World Inc., Does 1-50, inclusive, filed by Plaintiff Matthew Marshall. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/5/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL AS ATTACHMENT NO.1 #1 . (et) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Hat World Inc.. (Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Hat World Inc. identifying Genesco, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Hat World Inc., identifying Genesco, Inc.. (Farag, Shareef) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC719785 with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 10/26/2018, receipt number 0973-22652076), filed by Defendant Hat World Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer, #3 Declaration of Carrie Baird) (Attorney Shareef Swamy Farag added to party Hat World Inc.(pty:dft))(Farag, Shareef) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.