Elisa Lieberman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Elisa Lieberman |
Commissioner of Social Security |
2:2018cv09256 |
October 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Rozella A Oliver |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Patrick W Snyder added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Snyder, Patrick) |
Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Elisa Lieberman, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 11/27/2018, answer due 1/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 6 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file1 an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. See Order for details. (dml) |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (dml) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should have been e-filed separately and in the correct event category. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (car) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Pena, Jonathan) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22659958 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Jonathan Omar Pena added to party Elisa Lieberman(pty:pla))(Pena, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Elisa Lieberman v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Patrick W Snyder |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elisa Lieberman | |
Represented By: | Jonathan Omar Pena |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.