Michael Marvisi et al v. Federal Insurance Company
| MICHAEL MARVISI and ANA MARVISI |
| Federal Insurance Company and DOES 1-10, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv09342 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| John F Walter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiffs Ana Marvisi, Michael Marvisi. (Treyzon, Boris) |
Filing 23
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge John F. Walter. In the Notice of Settlement emailed to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk on December 19, 2018, the parties represent that they have settled this action. As a result, the Court dismisses this action without prejudice subject to either party reopening the action on or before January 18, 2019. The Court will retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the settlement until January 18, 2019. Thereafter, absent further order of the Court, the dismissal of this action will be with prejudice. All dates in this action, including the trial date are vacated. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv)
|
| Filing 22 PROOF OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE In Support of Opposition re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss FIRST AMENDED COMPAINT #19 filed by Plaintiffs Ana Marvisi, Michael Marvisi. (Treyzon, Boris) |
| Filing 21 Opposition Opposition to Motion re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss FIRST AMENDED COMPAINT #19 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiffs Ana Marvisi, Michael Marvisi. (Treyzon, Boris) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Dismiss #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Electronic Lodging of Proposed Orders. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss FIRST AMENDED COMPAINT filed by DEFENDANT Federal Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 1/7/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 18 STATEMENT of Rule -3 Conference Regarding Defendant Federal Insurance Company's Motion To Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company re: Amended Complaint/Petition #14 . (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 17 Text Entry Order in response to Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A), #16 : Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 20, inclusive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: First Amended Complaint #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 19-1 Complaint/Petition includes more than 10 Does or fictitiously named parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiffs Ana Marvisi, Michael Marvisi, re Amended Complaint/Petition #14 was served on November 26, 2016. (Treyzon, Boris) |
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiffs Michael Marvisi, Ana Marvisi (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Insurance Policy)(Treyzon, Boris) |
| Filing 13 STATEMENT Joint Statement of Rule 7-3 Conference re Federal Insurance Company's Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 12 Text Entry Order: Defendant Federal Insurance Companys Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) filed on November 8, 2018 is DENIED without prejudice to re-filing in accordance with the Courts Standing Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for January 7, 2019 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before December 22, 2018. (iv)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter, (sr)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss second and third counts, the prayer for punitive damages, and the allegations related to promissory fraud be dismissed, without leave to amend with certificate of service filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company. Motion set for hearing on 12/10/2018 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-09342 JFW(ASx). (rn) |
| Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by defendant Federal Insurance Company. (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Service of Notice to Adverse Party of Removal to Federal Court re: Notice (Other) #3 (McPherson, Mary) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiffs Michael Marvisi and Ana Marvisi in Los Angeles Superior Court on 8/30/2018, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO ADVERSE PARTY OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT filed by DEFENDANT Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice to Adverse Party)(McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company identifying Chubb INA Holdings, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (McPherson, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number BC720035 Receipt No: 0973-22676072 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Federal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet) (Attorney Mary E McPherson added to party Federal Insurance Company(pty:dft))(McPherson, Mary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
