Kim Emery v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Kim Emery, Colleen Guenther and Patrick Emery
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv09370
Filed: November 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Alexander F MacKinnon
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
November 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
November 7, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-09370 AB(AFMx). (rn)
November 6, 2018 Filing 6 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. The Defendant does not consent. (Rogers, Matthew)
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap)
November 2, 2018 NON CONFORM COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to without prejudice filed by plaintiff Patrick Emery. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1)(ghap)
November 2, 2018 NON CONFORM COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to without prejudice filed by plaintiff Colleen Guenther. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap)
November 2, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY (WITHOUT COURT ORDER) for Pro Se Kim Emery in place of attorney Jonathan A. Michaels. filed by plaintiff Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/24/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1)(ghap)
November 2, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/3/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap)
November 2, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Patrick Emery, Colleen Guenther, Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/5/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
November 2, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/1/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) Modified on 11/5/2018 (ghap).
November 2, 2018 Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.. (Rogers, Matthew)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Rogers, Matthew)
November 2, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Rogers, Matthew)
November 2, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC700970 Receipt No: 0973-22684477 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Summons, #4 Exhibit D - MBUSA's Answer, #5 Exhibit E- Remainder of State Court File) (Attorney Matthew R Rogers added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Rogers, Matthew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kim Emery v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Emery
Represented By: Daniel Alexander Uribe
Represented By: Jonathan A Michaels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colleen Guenther
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Emery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Represented By: Matthew R Rogers
Represented By: Emma E Jacobson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?