Kim Emery v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
Kim Emery, Colleen Guenther and Patrick Emery |
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive |
2:2018cv09370 |
November 2, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Andre Birotte |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. Scheduling Conference set for 2/15/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-09370 AB(AFMx). (rn) |
Filing 6 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. The Defendant does not consent. (Rogers, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to without prejudice filed by plaintiff Patrick Emery. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1)(ghap) |
NON CONFORM COPY OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL as to without prejudice filed by plaintiff Colleen Guenther. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY (WITHOUT COURT ORDER) for Pro Se Kim Emery in place of attorney Jonathan A. Michaels. filed by plaintiff Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/24/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by plaintiff Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/3/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiffs Patrick Emery, Colleen Guenther, Kim Emery. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/5/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to First Amended Complaint, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/1/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT D)(ghap) Modified on 11/5/2018 (ghap). |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC.. (Rogers, Matthew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, identifying Daimler North America Corporation. (Rogers, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Rogers, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC700970 Receipt No: 0973-22684477 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - First Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit C- Summons, #4 Exhibit D - MBUSA's Answer, #5 Exhibit E- Remainder of State Court File) (Attorney Matthew R Rogers added to party Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Rogers, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.