In Re Sawtelle Partners, LLC
Appellee: Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Emaciation Capital, LLC
Undetermined: Sawtelle Partners, LLC
Appellant: Satellite Capital, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv09374
Filed: November 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES [Dkt. #8 ] by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Appellant's ex parte application to consolidate cases is GRANTED. The two cases arise from the same adversary proceeding and are inextricably intertwined. In the interests of judicial economy, the Court will STAY briefing concerning Appeal Two, pending adjudication of the related appeal before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP No. 18-1032). The stay is without prejudice to Emaciation Capital, LLC's right to file a dispositive motion. (iv)
December 6, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed order not submitted pursuant to Local Rule 52-4.1. A Word or Wordperfect version of the proposed order should also be emailed to the chambers generic email address. See Local Rule 5-4.4.1- Electronic Lodging of Proposed Orders. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. (iv)
December 4, 2018 Filing 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Consolidate Cases, as to 2:18-cv-7461, filed by Plaintiff/Appellant Satellite Capital, LLC. (Shemano, David)
November 28, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE RE: BANKRUPTCY RECORD COMPLETE. Please note, pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8010(b)(3), this Court has received from the Clerk of the Bankruptcy Court either the record for the above-captioned appeal or notice that the record is available electronically. The parties are responsible for reading and complying with all requirements, including briefing, provided in this notice. Appellant must serve and file a brief by 12/28/2018. (iv)
November 28, 2018 Filing 6 Notice of Bankruptcy Appeal Record Availability re Notice of Appeal from Bankruptcy Court Order/Judgment #1 . (iv)
November 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Cormac J. Carney:The appeal in the above bankruptcy matter has been assigned to this Court. Pursuant to the Notice Regarding Appeal from Bankruptcy Court issued by this Court on November 2, 2018 #2 , appellant was ordered within fourteen days after filing the notice of appeal, to file the following: (see minutes for details). Appellant is hereby ordered to show cause in writing, on or before November 28, 2018 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure of Appellant to make an adequate and/or timely response to this Order will result in the dismissal of the appeal. (yl)
November 2, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 2, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL (ADVERSARY) prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 11/1/2018. (ghap)
November 2, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (ghap)
November 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL: Re: Order, After Hearing, Granting Emaciation Capital, LLC's Motion for Order Awarding Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure entered on 10/18/2018 by Bankruptcy Judge Barry Russell, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 11/1/2018. Bankruptcy Court case number: 2:16-bk-21234-BR, Adversary number: 2:17-ap-01541-BR, BAP case number: N/A., filed by appellant Satellite Capital, LLC. (Attachments: #1 BK Court Docket Sheets) (ghap) Modified on 11/7/2018 (ghap).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Sawtelle Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Emaciation Capital, LLC
Represented By: Ronald N Richards
Represented By: Daniel A Lev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: Sawtelle Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Satellite Capital, LLC
Represented By: David Bruce Shemano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?