John Dlugolecki v. Backgrid USA, Inc.
| John Dlugolecki |
| Backgrid USA Inc. |
| 2:2018cv09400 |
| November 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Manuel L Real |
| Gail J Standish |
| George H Wu |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Backgrid USA Inc.. upon Backgrid USA Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 11/20/2018, answer due 1/22/2019. Waiver of Service signed by Joanna Ardalan. (Ardalan, Joanna) |
Filing 14
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Kenneth P. Norwick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff John Dlugolecki, designating Max J. Sprecher as local counsel #10 . (iv)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-03905 GW(GJSx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver and Judge Manuel L. Real to Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-09400 GW(GJSx). Signed by Judge George H. Wu (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kenneth P. Norwick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff John Dlugolecki (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22697363) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Please note that electronic, image or stamp signatures are not allowed. (lt) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Kenneth P. Norwick to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff John Dlugolecki (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22697363) filed by plaintiff John Dlugolecki. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #2 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff John Dlugolecki. (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Kenneth P. Norwick. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by JOHN DLUGOLECKI. (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JOHN DLUGOLECKI, (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOHN DLUGOLECKI. (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff JOHN DLUGOLECKI. (Sprecher, Max) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22690031 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff JOHN DLUGOLECKI. (Attorney Max J Sprecher added to party JOHN DLUGOLECKI(pty:pla))(Sprecher, Max) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: John Dlugolecki v. Backgrid USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Dlugolecki | |
| Represented By: | Max J Sprecher |
| Represented By: | Kenneth P Norwick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Backgrid USA Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
