Ciron B. Springfield v. K. Estrada et al
Ciron B. Springfield and Ciron B Springfield |
T. Rhodes, A. Gaffney, K. Estrada, T. Lenwodowski and J. Williams |
2:2018cv09488 |
November 8, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Dean D Pregerson |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the complaint #7 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 7-1) as of December 3, 2018. The order to show cause is discharged. (see order for details) (hr) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg granting #4 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 4 191 S, the prisoner- plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $14.00 must be paid within thirty (30) days of the date this order is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 4 1915(b)(2). (hr) |
Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants amending Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 ; JURY DEMAND, filed by Plaintiff Ciron B Springfield(hr) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Plaintiff Ciron B Springfield. (Attachments: #1 Lodged First Amended Complaint) (hr) |
Filing 6 PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE #5 filed by Plaintiff Ciron B Springfield. (kl) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before December 10, 2018, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing why the court should not recommend denial of his application to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. If Petitioner fails to respond to this order to show cause by December 10, 2018, the court may recommend that the application for proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice. (See Order for Further Details) (kl) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (lh) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (lh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants K. Estrada(Appeals Coordinator, official capacity), K. Estrada(Appeals Coordinator, individual), A. Gaffney(Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity), A. Gaffney(Correctional Lieutenant, individual), T. Lenwodowski(Associated Warden, official capacity), T. Lenwodowski(Associate Warden, individual), T. Rhodes(Correctional Counselor II, individual), T. Rhodes(Correctional Counselor II, official capacity), J. Williams(Correctional Counselor I, individual), J. Williams(Correctional Counselor I, official capacity) pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Filed by Plaintiff Ciron B. Springfield. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.