Albert Blondeel-Timmerman v. Sunset Bronson Services, LLC et al
| Albert Blondeel-Timmerman |
| Sunset Bronson Services, LLC and Does 1-50, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv09504 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| John E McDermott |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Remand #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Hearing information is missing, incorrect, or not timely. Other error(s) with document(s): The court notes that an amended, corrected Motion has been e-filed on 1/4/19, document #17 indicating an open hearing date. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
| Filing 17 Amended NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Albert Blondeel-Timmerman. Motion set for hearing on 3/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sheryl L. Marx in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Proposed Order) (Maccarone, Sheryl) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Albert Blondeel-Timmerman. Motion set for hearing on 1/18/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sheryl L. Marx in support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Proposed Order) (Attorney Sheryl Lyn Maccarone added to party Albert Blondeel-Timmerman(pty:pla)) (Maccarone, Sheryl) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Sunset Bronson Services, LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings,, #14 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrea Rupp, #2 Exhibit A to Rupp Declaration)(Hernandez, Steve) |
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re Order to Show Cause re: lack of subject matter jurisdiction by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: For the reasons stated above, the Court is not convinced that it has jurisdiction over this matter. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to show cause in writing no later than January 4, 2019 why the case should not be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond by this date will result in the Court remanding the case. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Filing of Notice to Superior Court filed by Defendant Sunset Bronson Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Hernandez, Steve) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 16-05 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:18-cv-08364 SVW(FFMx) (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Albert Blondeel-Timmerman, (Brandes, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Plaintiff Albert Blondeel-Timmerman.. (Brandes, Christopher) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 5/20/2019 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Related Case(s) #4 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 served on November 9, 2018. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-08364 (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC, identifying Hudson Pacific Services, Inc.; Axis Capital;. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC. (Hernandez, Steve) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC722843 Receipt No: 0973-22720243 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Steve L. Hernandez, #2 Exhibit 1 to Hernandez Dec., #3 Exhibit 2 to Hernandez Dec., #4 Exhibit 3 to Hernandez Dec., #5 Exhibit 4 to Hernandez Dec., #6 Exhibit 5 to Hernandez Dec., #7 Declaration of Kay Tidwell, #8 Exhibit Part 1 of Exhibit 1 to Tidwell Dec., #9 Exhibit Part 2 of Exhibit 1 to Tidwell Dec., #10 Exhibit Part 3 of Exhibit 1 to Tidwell Dec.) (Attorney Steve L Hernandez added to party SUNSET BRONSON SERVICES, LLC(pty:dft))(Hernandez, Steve) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-50, inclusive, Sunset Bronson Services, LLC. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Albert Blondeel-Timmerman. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/26/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Sunset Bronson Services, LLC. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/8/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 5)(ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
