Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al v. Los Angeles Apparel, Inc
| Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd and Hartford Fire Insurance Company |
| Los Angeles Apparel, Inc |
| 2:2018cv09506 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Los Angeles Apparel, Inc filed by Plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Valeria Granata ISO Motion for Clerk's Default Judgment, #2 Declaration of Deorah Schmaltz ISO Motion for Clerk's Default Judgment, #3 Proposed Order ISO Motion for Clerk's Default Judgment) (Granata, Valeria) |
| Filing 11 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Los Angeles Apparel, Inc. (bp) |
| Filing 10 REQUEST for Entry of Default against defendant Los Angeles Apparel, Inc filed by plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Affidavit) (Enger, William) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd, upon Defendant Los Angeles Apparel, Inc served on 11/12/2018, answer due 12/3/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Los Angeles Apparel Inc. and agent for service of process David H. Nisenbaum in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Enger, William) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Los Angeles Apparel, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (car) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Rule 7.1 filed by Plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd identifying The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. as Corporate Parent. (Enger, William) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. (Enger, William) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. (Enger, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22720697 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. (Attorney William K Enger added to party Hartford Fire Insurance Company(pty:pla), Attorney William K Enger added to party Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd(pty:pla))(Enger, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
