L.A. Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance Company
| L.A. Terminals, Inc. |
| United National Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv09544 |
| November 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Otis D Wright |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL OF THE ENTIRE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE #9 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff L.A. Terminals, Inc.. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Roberts, Brook) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant United National Insurance Company. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff L.A. Terminals, Inc., identifying Brilliant National Services Inc.. (Roberts, Brook) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff L.A. Terminals, Inc.. (Roberts, Brook) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff L.A. Terminals, Inc.. (Roberts, Brook) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22726279 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff L.A. Terminals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5) (Attorney Brook Blaine Roberts added to party L.A. Terminals, Inc.(pty:pla))(Roberts, Brook) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: L.A. Terminals, Inc. v. United National Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United National Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: L.A. Terminals, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brook Blaine Roberts |
| Represented By: | Steven B Lesan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
