James Martin v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen
| James Martin |
| Kristjen M Nielsen |
| 2:2018cv09575 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER STAYING THE ENTIRE CASE DUE TO THE LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS #8 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr that due to the lapse in appropriations to the Department of Justice, the entire case is stayed until Department of Justice attorneys are permitted to resume their usual civil litigation functions. Within 3 days of defense counsel being permitted to resume their duties, Defendant is ORDERED to file a Status Report so stating, along with a proposed Order vacating the stay. (jp)
|
| Filing 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case , Declaration of David M. Harris filed by Defendant Kristjen M Nielsen. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Staying the Entire Case Due to the Lapse of Appropriations) (Attorney Chung Hae Han added to party Kristjen M Nielsen(pty:dft)) (Han, Chung) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 . The following error(s) was found: Attachment 2 Notice of Interested Parties and attachment 3 Summons should have been e-filed separately and in the correct event category. Certificate of Interested Parties event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Notices. Summons Request event is located under Civil Events Service Documents Service/Waivers of Summons and Complaints. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (car) |
| Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Kristjen M Nielsen. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (car) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff James Martin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Interested parties, #3 Summon)(Ackerman, Ronald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22732435 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff James Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney Ronald P Ackerman added to party James Martin(pty:pla))(Ackerman, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James Martin v. Kirstjen M. Nielsen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kristjen M Nielsen | |
| Represented By: | Chung Hae Han |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Martin | |
| Represented By: | Ronald P Ackerman |
| Represented By: | Oshea V Orchid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
