Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc. v. Janice Cho et al
Plaintiff: Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc.
Defendant: Janice Cho and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv09634
Filed: November 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Referring Judge: Suzanne H Segal
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2019 Filing 11 OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division #10 filed by Plaintiff Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc.. (Lee, Won)
December 19, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Transfer Case to Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division filed by DEFENDANT Janice Cho. Motion set for hearing on 1/28/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit EXH. A, #3 Exhibit EXH. B, #4 Exhibit EXH. C, #5 Exhibit EXH. D, #6 Exhibit EXH. E, #7 Exhibit EXH. F, #8 Exhibit EXH. G, #9 Exhibit EXH. H, #10 Exhibit EXH. I, #11 Exhibit EXH. J, #12 Exhibit EXH. K, #13 Exhibit EXH. L, #14 Exhibit EXH. M, #15 Exhibit EXH. N, #16 Exhibit EXH. O, #17 Exhibit EXH. P, #18 Exhibit EXH. Q) (Song, Richard)
December 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This case has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. This matter is set for a scheduling conference on 1/28/2019 at 11:00 AM. (iv)
December 4, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Answer to Complaint #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Pursuant to Local Rule 8-3, any amended or supplemental pleading require approval by the Judge. Answer filed 11/14/2018. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (iv)
November 28, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 JURY DEMAND. AMENDED ANSWER filed by Defendant Janice Cho.(Song, Richard)
November 16, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments 5 Civil Cover Sheet, 6 Supplement Cert of Interested Parties are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ghap)
November 16, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 16, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap)
November 14, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Janice Cho, Does 1 through 20, inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/17/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) Modified on 11/16/2018 (ghap).
November 14, 2018 Filing 3 AMENDED ANSWER TO STATE COMPLAINT, to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 DEF'S FEDERAL ANSWER TO STATE COMPLAINT filed by ATTY. OF DEFENDANT JANICE CHO. (Song, Richard)
November 14, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by ATTY. OF DEFENDANT JANICE CHO, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 served on NOV. 15, 2018. (Song, Richard)
November 14, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, case number 18STCV01121 Receipt No: 0973-22745027 - Fee: $400, filed by ATTY. OF DEFENDANT JANICE CHO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit STATE SUMMONS, COMPLAINT, #2 Exhibit DECL. OF DEFENDANT, #3 Exhibit PROOF OF PLAINTIFF-DEFENDANT DIVERSITY, #4 Supplement PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF DAMAGES, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplement CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES) (Attorney Richard Song added to party JANICE CHO(pty:dft))(Song, Richard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc. v. Janice Cho et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joong-Ang Daily News California, Inc.
Represented By: Won Kee Lee
Represented By: Anna Rozman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janice Cho
Represented By: Richard Song
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?