Cathy Shu v. Marilyn Marquez et al
Plaintiff: Cathy Shu
Defendant: Does 1 to 10 and Marilyn Marquez
Case Number: 2:2018cv09639
Filed: November 15, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2018 Filing 9 Receipt of Acknowledgment of remand documents by Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, case no. 18PDUD02440. (lom)
November 28, 2018 Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Pasadena. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Pasadena. (bp)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING ACTION AND DENYING REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, forthwith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. Made JS-6 (bp)
November 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #3 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (bp)
November 19, 2018 RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(dml)
November 15, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
November 15, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et)
November 15, 2018 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Marilyn Marquez. (et)
November 15, 2018 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Cathy Shu. (et)
November 15, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of CA for the County of Los Angeles, Pasadena, case number 18PDUD02440 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver., filed by Defendant Marilyn Marquez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cathy Shu v. Marilyn Marquez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cathy Shu
Represented By: Richard Lawrence Dewberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marilyn Marquez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?