Jane Doe v. Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd. et al
| Jane Doe |
| Does 1 to 100, inclusive, Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd., Patrick Sutton and Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd. an entity form unknown doing business as Huntington Memorial Hospital |
| The Medical Staff of Huntington Memorial Hospital |
| 2:2018cv09648 |
| November 15, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #21 as to Defendant The Medical Staff of Huntington Memorial Hospital. (shb) |
| Filing 22 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #21 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 21 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant The Medical Staff of Huntington Memorial Hospital amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 JURY DEMAND, filed by plaintiff Jane Doe(Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.. Related Case(s): 2:18-cv-08710-ODW-MAA (Lieurance, Cherie) |
Filing 19
ORDER granting Stipulation to Extend Time to Answer (More than 30 days), #17 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. HAVING considered the Stipulation and GOOD CAUSE appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. Defendant Huntington Memorial Hospitals deadline to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is hereby extended to January 11, 2019. (shb)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: GRANTING #15 Renewed REQUEST to proceed anonymously. (shb)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 01/11/2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Extension of Time to File Answer)(Lieurance, Cherie) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Renewed REQUEST to proceed anonymously #15 filed by Defendant Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.. (Attorney N Denise Taylor added to party Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.(pty:dft))(Taylor, N) |
| Filing 15 Renewed REQUEST to proceed anonymously filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Jane Doe, #3 Proposed Order) (Barnes, Kevin) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Leave to Proceed Anonymously [Dkt. 10] is DENIED, without prejudice. A party may proceed under a pseudonym in special circumstances when the partys need for anonymity outweighs prejudice to the opposing party and the publics interest in knowing the partys identity. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp, 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000). Here, however, Plaintiff's Application and supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities lackspecificity and the Declaration of Jane Doe, to which the Application refers, has not been filed with this Court. Indeed, Plaintiff's Application and Memorandum discuss a different Plaintiff and Defendant. (Memorandum at 2, lines 18-22.) (shb) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, upon Defendant Patrick Sutton served on 11/19/2018, answer due 12/10/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Leticai Cumarena, Medical Assistant in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, upon Defendant Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd. served on 11/28/2018, answer due 12/19/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Loren Wenuser, Risk Management in compliance with statute not specified by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Request for Leave to Proceed Anonymously filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Proposed Order) (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Patrick Sutton. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe, (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Jane Doe. (Barnes, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22747548 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Jane Doe. (Attorney Kevin T Barnes added to party Jane Doe(pty:bkmov))(Barnes, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
