Immanuel Christian Price v. C and PR Harris
| Immanuel Christian Price |
| R and R RN Wilcher, John Doe and C and PR Harris |
| 2:2018cv09682 |
| November 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS) (iva)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee.. (kca)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of address Changing plaintiff's address to Immanuel Christian Price G51247, CSP-LAC, PO Box 8457, Lancaster, CA 93539. Filed by Plaintiff Immanuel Christian Price.(sbou) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Immanuel Christian Price. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Immanuel Christian Price against Defendants C and PR Harris, John Doe, R and R RN Wilcher, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
