Mia Antuna v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Mia Antuna |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 2:2018cv09808 |
| November 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #12 APPLICATION to Stay Case (rrey) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION to Stay Case filed by defendant United States of America (rrey) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Mia Antuna, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 11/28/2018, answer due 3/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (dv)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (dv) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (dv)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Mia Antuna, (Shvarts, Michelle) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Mia Antuna. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Mia Antuna. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Mia Antuna. (Shvarts, Michelle) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Mia Antuna. (Attorney Michelle J Shvarts added to party Mia Antuna(pty:bkmov))(Shvarts, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mia Antuna v. Nancy A. Berryhill | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
| Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
| Represented By: | Armand D Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mia Antuna | |
| Represented By: | Michelle J Shvarts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
