Celinda Vazquez v. Rajin Cajun Cafe et al
| Celinda Vazquez |
| Rajin Cajun Cafe, Adriatica International, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 2:2018cv09846 |
| November 23, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Adriatica International, Inc., Rajin Cajun Cafe. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Celinda Vazquez. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 3 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Celinda Vazquez, (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Celinda Vazquez. (Nakano, Jarrod) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22785757 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Celinda Vazquez. (Attorney Jarrod Yutaka Nakano added to party Celinda Vazquez(pty:pla))(Nakano, Jarrod) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
