Samuel Quinton Bonner v. Josie Gastelo
| Samuel Quintin Bonner |
| Josie Gastelo |
| 2:2018cv09916 |
| November 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Steve Kim |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Petitioner requests an extension of time to file a response to the Order to Show Cause. (ECF No. #5 ). The request is GRANTED. Petitioners response is due on or before February 25, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Petitioner Samuel Quintin Bonner. (clee) |
| Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 filing fee from Samuel Bonner. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA181968. (ek) |
|
Filing 3
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim.For all these reasons, Petitioner is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before January 11, 2019 why the Petition should not be summarily dismissed. If Petitioner does not file a timely response to this Order to Show Cause, the Court may also recommend involuntary dismissal of the Petition for failure to prosecute or obey court orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P 41(b); L.R. 41-1. If Petitioner no longer wishes to pursue this action, he may voluntarily dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) by filing a Voluntary Notice of Dismissal on the attached Form CV-009. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Voluntary Dismissal CV-009) (clee)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111 Notice of Discrepancies for filing of Habeas Corpus Petition and CV60p) (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE.), filed by Petitioner Samuel Quinton Bonner. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Samuel Quinton Bonner v. Josie Gastelo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Josie Gastelo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Samuel Quintin Bonner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
