Lee v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
| Edward Lee |
| Quality Loan Service Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and DOES 1-20, inclusive |
| 2:2018cv09951 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL #13 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. The Clerk shall close the file in this case. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Edward Lee. Dismissal is Without Prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Maaz, Mohammad) |
| Filing 12 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #8 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #8 filed by Plaintiff Edward Lee. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Singh, Harpreet) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Joinder (non-motion) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Assignment to United States Judges(CV-18) - optional html form #5 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on November 28, 2018. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint #8 filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G to Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss Complaint)(Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Complaint filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Motion set for hearing on 1/14/2019 at 10:00 AM before Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint) (Reeves, Dean) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 16-05 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case transferred from Judge Stephen V. Wilson to the calendar of Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:18-cv-09951 MWF (Ex). (esa)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Edward Lee in Los Angeles Superior Court on 10/1/2018, attached as Exhibit A. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., identifying Wells Fargo & Co.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Reeves, Dean) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, North Central District, case number EC069440 Receipt No: 0973-22807794 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D to Notice of Removal) (Attorney Dean A Reeves added to party Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(pty:dft))(Reeves, Dean) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
