Maureen Levine v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Maureen Levine |
| Ford Motor Company, Fairway Ford, Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Fairway Ford Sales, Inc. and Fairway Ford Sales, Inc. doing business as Fairway Ford |
| 2:2018cv09995 |
| November 29, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court. (mrgo) |
Filing 18
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND #11 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Case Remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, 18STCV02671. (See document for details) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING NOTICE/IN CHAMBERS ORDER TEXT-ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff #11 - The motion is submitted. Order to issue. The hearing set for 3/4/2019 is vacated and off-calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 16 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: Initial Status Conference and Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 - The conference is vacated and off-calendar. The motion hearing previously scheduled for 02/25/2019 at 1:30 PM has been rescheduled to 3/4/2019 at 01:30 PM. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 15 REPLY in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiff Maureen Levine. (Tai, Daniel) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REMAND re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Counsel in Support of Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3)(Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 13 (Tai, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 SCHEDULING NOTICE: The initial status conference previously scheduled for 01/28/2019 at 3:00 PM has been rescheduled to 2/25/2019 at 1:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Maureen Levine. Motion set for hearing on 2/25/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration of Hayk Proshyan, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #6 Exhibit 1 to RJN, #7 Proposed Order) (Proshyan, Hayk) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 1/28/2019 at 3:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
|
Filing 9
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Hayk Proshyan counsel for Plaintiff Maureen Levine. Adding Hayk Proshyan as counsel of record for Maureen Levine for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Hayk Proshyan. (Attorney Hayk Proshyan added to party Maureen Levine(pty:pla))(Proshyan, Hayk) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Fairway Ford, Ford Motor Company. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Maureen Levine. Filed in State Court on 10/26/18 Submitted with attachment 1 to notice of removal #1 (car) Modified on 12/3/2018 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. Submitted with Attachment 4 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) Modified on 12/3/2018 (car). |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Fairway Ford Sales, Inc. Submitted with Attachment 5 to notice of removal #1 .(car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Fairway Ford, (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Charles F. Harlow re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 filed by Defendants Fairway Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Fairway Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Harlow, Charles) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, case number 18STCV02671 Receipt No: 0973-22819263 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Fairway Ford, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Service of Process, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Original Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Ford's Answer, #5 Exhibit E - Fairway Ford's Answer, #6 Exhibit F - Ford's 2017 10-K Filing Excerpt) (Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Fairway Ford(pty:dft), Attorney Charles Frederick Harlow added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Harlow, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
