Robert Jaffe v. Brad Sherman et al
Robert Jaffe |
Congressman Brad Sherman and Does 1-10 |
2:2018cv09998 |
November 29, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
R Gary Klausner |
Frederick F Mumm |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Robert Jaffe, upon Defendant Brad Sherman served on 12/7/2018, answer due 2/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Noah Sachartoff, who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of congressman Bud Sherman. (bp) |
Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Robert Jaffe. (et) |
Filing 3 EXHIBIT LIST to Complaint #1 filed by Plaintiff Robert Jaffe. (et) |
Filing 2 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Brad Sherman. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Brad Sherman, Does 1-10. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Filing fee $ 400 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Robert Jaffe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.