Dwain Lammey v. Starbucks Corporation et al
Dwain Lammey |
Does 1-10 and Starbucks Corporation |
2:2018cv10017 |
November 30, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
Otis D Wright |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 3/18/2019 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 12 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (lc) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation.(Villamor, Myra) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Starbucks Corporation, (Attorney Myra B Villamor added to party Starbucks Corporation(pty:dft))(Villamor, Myra) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey, upon Defendant Starbucks Corporation served on 12/11/2018, answer due 1/2/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY WHICH WILL DO BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA AS CSC - LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE / Becky De George -Agent for Service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents (lc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Starbucks Corporation. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Dwain Lammey. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey, (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dwain Lammey. (Carson, Chris) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22821962 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Dwain Lammey. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Dwain Lammey(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.