Daniel Lopez v. Michael Po Eng et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Lopez
Defendant: Does 1-10, Serina Socheat Chan and Michael Po Eng
Case Number: 2:2018cv10022
Filed: November 30, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 11, 2019 Filing 19 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Serina Socheat Chan, re APPLICATION for Stay and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #17 served on January 9, 2019. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 17 APPLICATION for Stay and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Serina Socheat Chan. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Serina Socheat Chan, re Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #15 , Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #14 served on January 9, 2019. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 15 CERTIFICATE and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Serina Socheat Chan, (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Serina Socheat Chan.(hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Michael Po Eng, re APPLICATION for Stay and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #12 served on January 9, 2019. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 12 APPLICATION for Stay and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Michael Po Eng. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Michael Po Eng, re Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #9 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #10 served on January 9, 2019. (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Michael Po Eng (hr)
January 9, 2019 Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Michael Po Eng.(hr)
December 31, 2018 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, upon Defendant Michael Po Eng(in individual) served on 12/21/2018, answer due 1/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Michael Po Eng in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris)
December 21, 2018 Filing 7 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, upon Defendant Serina Socheat Chan served on 12/19/2018, answer due 1/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Serina Socheat Chan in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris)
December 3, 2018 Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Serina Socheat Chan, Michael Po Eng(representative capacity as trustee of The Michael Po Eng Trust), Michael Po Eng(in individual). (et)
December 3, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (Attachments: #1 CV11- Statement of Consent) (et)
November 30, 2018 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Carson, Chris)
November 30, 2018 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, (Carson, Chris)
November 30, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Carson, Chris)
November 30, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22822006 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Daniel Lopez(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Lopez v. Michael Po Eng et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Serina Socheat Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Po Eng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lopez
Represented By: Chris Carson
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?