Sherman Kinard v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP et al
| Sherman Kinard |
| Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive |
| 2:2018cv10044 |
| November 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| S James Otero |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge S. James Otero. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/11/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 3/25/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Steve Kim to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:18-cv-10044 SJO (JEMx). (esa) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT Non Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP re: Notice to Counsel (CV-20a) Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program - optional html form #5 . (Savion, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 REMINDER NOTICE re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. Each party must file form CV-11C within the consent deadlines pursuant to L.R. 73-2. Additionally, the parties are directed to L.R. 73-2.2 Proof of Service. In any case in which only a magistrate judge is initially assigned, plaintiff must file a proof of service within 10 days of service of the summons and complaint as to each defendant. (Attachments: #1 Consent CV-11C) (clee) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statement of Consent to Proceed) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/29/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Sherman Kinard. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/2/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, identifying Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP; Plaintiff Sherman Kinard; Penske Truck Leasing Corporation; Penske Automotibe Group, Inc.; MBK USA Commercial Vehicles, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Savion, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP identifying Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. as Corporate Parent. (Savion, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Decl. of Denise Visconti, #2 Declaration Decl. of David Battisti, #3 Declaration Decl. of Jennifer Diercksmeier)(Savion, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number BC723786 Receipt No: 0973-22825886 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Answer) (Attorney Jennifer E Savion added to party Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP(pty:dft))(Savion, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
