Henery Anekwu v. ICE et al
| Henery Anekwu |
| US Government and ICE |
| 2:2018cv10107 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John D Early |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (see document for information) (hr)
|
| Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400.00 filing fee from Henery Anekwu. Re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, #4 . Receipt number LA182076. (ek) |
|
Filing 4
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: Failure to Pay Filing Fee. The Court hereby grants Plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to: (a) prepay the entire $400 civil filling and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a proper request to proceed IFP. (Attachments: #1 Blank IFP App) (mba)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (car) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (car) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants ICE, US Government Case assigned to Judge George H. Wu and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by plaintiff Henery Anekwu. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
