Sajahtera, Inc. v. Robert China Berry Jr
| SAJAHTERA INC., Sajahtera, Inc. and Sajahtera, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as The Beverly Hills Hotel doing business as Black Beverly Hills |
| Robert China Berry, Jr., Robert China Berry, Jr and Robert China Berry, Jr an individual doing business as The Beverly Hills Hotel |
| 2:2018cv10197 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| S James Otero |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Robert China Berry, Jr. dba Black Beverly Hills answer now due 3/4/2019 filed by Defendant Robert China Berry, Jr.(lc) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant Sajahtera, Inc., upon Defendant Robert China Berry, Jr served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Robert China Berry, Jr. and individual dba BLACK BEVERLY HILLS in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Maretz, Peter) |
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Sajahtera Inc. a Delaware Corporation dba The Beverly Hills Hotel Sajahtera, Inc., identifying The Dorchester Group, Ltd.. (Maretz, Peter) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Miscellaneous Document #4 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. The Clerk has corrected this error by re-docketing the AO 120. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Robert China Berry, Jr. (et) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (et) |
| Filing 5 **RE-DOCKET BY CLERK** REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Sajahtera, Inc. [Dkt. No 4 was docket wrong event] (et) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR TRADEMARK filed by Plaintiff SAJAHTERA INC. re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Maretz, Peter) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS filed by Plaintiff SAJAHTERA INC. re: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Maretz, Peter) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SAJAHTERA INC.. (Maretz, Peter) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22860251 - Fee: $400, filed by Sajahtera Inc. dba The Beverly Hills Complaint SAJAHTERA INC.. (Attorney Peter B Maretz added to party SAJAHTERA INC.(pty:pla))(Maretz, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
