B.Q. et al v. Mesa Union School District et al
| Carolyn Rodriguez Q. and B. Q. |
| Tonya Brunett, Mesa Union School District, Stephen Bluestein, Alexander Dekok, Jeff Turner, Does 1 to 10 and Dr. Stephen Bluestein |
| 2:2018cv10205 |
| December 7, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Douglas F McCormick |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Stephen Bluestein(in his official capacity as Principal of Mesa Union Elementary), Stephen Bluestein(individually ), Tonya Brunett(individually ), Tonya Brunett(in her official capacity as a member of the Board of Trustees of Mesa Union School District ), Alexander Dekok(in his official capacity as school teacher at Mesa Union Elementary), Alexander Dekok(individually ), Mesa Union School District, Jeff Turner(individually ), Jeff Turner(in his official capacity as Superintendent of Mesa Union School District). (bp) |
Filing 11
ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick: granting #5 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Carolyn Rodriguez-Q as Guardian ad Litem for B.Q. (sbou)
|
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by BQ B. Q.. (Pachowicz, Mark) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (car) |
| Filing 5 PETITION for Appointment of Carolyn Rodriguez Q as Guardian ad Litem for BQ filed by Plaintiff B. Q.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pachowicz, Mark) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Attorney Mark R Pachowicz added to party Carolyn Rodriguez Q.(pty:pla))(Pachowicz, Mark) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff B. Q.. (Pachowicz, Mark) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff B. Q.. (Pachowicz, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22861707 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff B. Q.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Mark R Pachowicz added to party B. Q.(pty:pla))(Pachowicz, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
