Tracey Reinberg v. Koroseal Interior Products, LLC et al
Tracey Reinberg |
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, KOROSEAL INTERIOR PRODUCTS, LLC, SANGETSU AMERICA, INC. and DOES 1-10 |
2:2018cv10211 |
December 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gail J Standish |
Stephen V Wilson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 19, 2019 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant Koroseal Interior Products, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Douglas Lipstone added to party Koroseal Interior Products, LLC(pty:dft))(Lipstone, Douglas) |
Filing 13 IN CHAMBERS ONLY TEXT-ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Order to Show Cause, issued on 1/7/2019, is extended by fourteen days, to and including 2/5/2019, to allow plaintiff to file a stipulation to extend time for defendants to answer. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinbergto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #11 (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Show Cause Response due by 1/21/2019.) (mrgo) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg, upon Defendant Koroseal Interior Products, LLC served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon The Corporation Trust Company - c/o Amy McLaren - Authorized Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg, upon Defendant Sangetsu America, Inc. served on 12/14/2018, answer due 1/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon The Prentice-Hall Corporation System c/o Lynanne Gares - Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 8 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Koroseal Interior Products, LLC, Sangetsu America, Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg, (Doniger, Stephen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22862186 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Tracey Reinberg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 to Complaint, #3 Exhibit 3 to Complaint, #4 Exhibit 4 to Complaint, #5 Exhibit 5 to Complaint, #6 Exhibit 6 to Complaint) (Attorney Stephen M Doniger added to party Tracey Reinberg(pty:pla))(Doniger, Stephen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.