Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. v. Pixels.com, LLC
| Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. and Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. doing business as MPTV Images |
| Pixels.com, LLC |
| 2:2018cv10232 |
| December 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #11 (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Pixels.com, LLC answer now due 3/1/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Pixels.com, LLC.(Attorney Jay A Woollacott added to party Pixels.com, LLC(pty:dft))(Woollacott, Jay) |
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than, February 7, 2019 at noon, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: Defendant(s) Answer or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default as to defendant(s). The Court may dismiss the entire action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff has not diligently prosecuted the action. (iv)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc., upon Defendant Pixels.com, LLC served on 1/9/2019, answer due 1/30/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Courtney H. "Doe", as person in charge of office at time of service in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Pixels.com, LLC. (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc., (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.. (Grossbardt, Jonah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22866409 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Registration, #2 Exhibit 2- Infringement, #3 Exhibit 3- Demand letters) (Attorney Jonah Adam Grossbardt added to party Sid Avery and Associates, Inc.(pty:pla))(Grossbardt, Jonah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
