Joseph Brandstetter v. Applied Acoustics Systems DVM, Inc.
Joseph A Brandstetter |
Applied Acoustics Systems DVM, Inc. and DOES 1 through 200, inclusive |
2:2018cv10288 |
December 11, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Dolly M Gee |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 44 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Applied Acoustics Systems DVM, Inc. (jtil) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jtil) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Joseph A Brandstetter. (Strecker, Marc) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph A Brandstetter, (Strecker, Marc) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Joseph A Brandstetter. (Strecker, Marc) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joseph A Brandstetter. (Strecker, Marc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22880319 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Joseph A Brandstetter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Examples of infringement) (Attorney Marc S Strecker added to party Joseph A Brandstetter(pty:pla))(Strecker, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.