Jose Velez v. Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc. et al
| Jose Velez |
| Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc., Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive and Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv10308 |
| December 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS #9 #12 by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case ; and #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case. For the above reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by February 27, 2019; otherwise, the Court will dismiss the action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (See document for details) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 19 IN CHAMBERS ONLY TEXT-ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson re: #9 MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by Defendant; and #12 MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants - The motions are submitted. Order to issue. The hearing set for 2/4/2019 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated and off-calendar. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF RESPONSE AND RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) #9 filed by Plaintiff Jose Velez. (mrgo) |
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of Zula Harring in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) #9 Reply filed by Defendant Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc.. (Stillman, Philip) |
| Filing 16 REPLY in support of Motion NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) #9 filed by Defendant Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc.. (Stillman, Philip) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc., Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc., identifying Original Jacks and Original Antonio's. (Thorpe, Brendan) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 by Clerk of Court. The document is accepted as filed. Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Interested Parties no later than 1/18/2019. (mrgo) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendants Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc., Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 2/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attorney Brendan J Thorpe added to party Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Brendan J Thorpe added to party Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Thorpe, Brendan) |
| Filing 11 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 1 filed. Parties request to Appear Before Magistrate Judge for settlement proceedings. Filed by Defendants Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc., Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc..(Thorpe, Brendan) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc., identifying Catalina Hotel Ops., Inc.. (Stillman, Philip) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) filed by Defendant Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 2/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points & Authorities In support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6)) (Attorney Philip H Stillman added to party Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Stillman, Philip) |
|
Filing 8
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jose Velez. (et) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 3 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 2 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES against Defendants Catalina Hotel Ops, Inc., Does, Original Antonios Pizzeria, Inc., Original Jacks Restaurant and Bakery, Inc. Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (Filing fee $ 400 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Jose Velez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
