Maryam Mnasakanyan et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
MARYAM MNASAKANYAN and GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN |
Dr. Marvin Southard, Does 1-10, inclusive, Dr. Stephen Shea, Sheriff Alex Villarnueva, Dr. Phuong Truong, Former Sheriff Jim McDonnell and County of Los Angeles |
2:2018cv10376 |
December 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dean D Pregerson |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. The address is http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov. It is not necessary to clear a motion date with the Court Clerk prior to filing the motion. The Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 a.m. See order for details. (shb) |
Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, Jim McDonnell, Stephen Shea, Marvin Southard, Phuong Truong, Alex Villarnueva. (shb) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Summons Issued #9 . The summons issued erroneously indicates that it is for the First Amended Complaint. The summons should be for the initial complaint. The summons will be re-issued on January 7, 2019. (shb) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants County of Los Angeles, Jim McDonnell, Stephen Shea, Marvin Southard, Phuong Truong, Alex Villarnueva. (shb) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Request #3 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #7 filed by PLAINTIFFs Gurgen Harutyunyan, Maryam Mnasakanyan. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Attachment to Summons)(Bakari, Omar) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (ghap) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN, MARYAM MNASAKANYAN, (Bakari, Omar) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by PLAINTIFF GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN, MARYAM MNASAKANYAN. (Bakari, Omar) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN, MARYAM MNASAKANYAN. (Bakari, Omar) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22899279 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF MARYAM MNASAKANYAN, GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN. (Attorney Omar Bakari added to party GURGEN HARUTYUNYAN(pty:pla), Attorney Omar Bakari added to party MARYAM MNASAKANYAN(pty:pla))(Bakari, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.