Shonna Counter v. Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC et al
| Shonna Counter |
| Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC, Does 1-10, King's Seafood Company, LLC and Kings Seafood Company, LLC |
| 2:2018cv10404 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| George H Wu |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu re: Notice of Settlement #14 . (Dismissal papers due by 4/10/2019. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/11/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu.) (mrgo)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement jointly filed by plaintiff Shonna Counter. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proof of Service)(Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shonna Counter, upon Defendant Kings Seafood Company, LLC served on 2/1/2019, answer due 2/22/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mattie Martinez- Office Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC. correcting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #11 (Gonzalez, Rafael) |
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to filed by defendant Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC.(Attorney Rafael Gonzalez added to party Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC(pty:dft))(Gonzalez, Rafael) |
|
Filing 10
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials by Judge George H. Wu. (lom)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Shonna Counter, upon Defendant Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC served on 1/10/2019, answer due 1/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for service - CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY- LAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE/Becky De George in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Carson, Chris) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 16-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:18-cv-10404 GW(Ex). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Douglas Emmett 1995, LLC, Kings Seafood Company, LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Shonna Counter. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Shonna Counter, (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Shonna Counter. (Carson, Chris) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22902450 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Shonna Counter. (Attorney Chris Carson added to party Shonna Counter(pty:pla))(Carson, Chris) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
