Joseph Shabani v. Kirstjen Nielsen et al
| Joseph Shabani |
| Donald Neufeld, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Daniel M Renaud and L. Francis Cissna |
| 2:2018cv10409 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| John E McDermott |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (pg)
|
| Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants L. Francis Cissna, Donald Neufeld, Kirstjen Nielsen, Daniel M Renaud. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Joseph Shabani. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joseph Shabani, identifying None. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Joseph Shabani. (Sedaghat, Shawn) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22904046 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Joseph Shabani. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-9) (Attorney Shawn Sedaghat added to party Joseph Shabani(pty:pla))(Sedaghat, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
