L Oreal USA Creative, Inc. et al v. Sallee Inc. et al
Plaintiff: L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC., L Oreal USA Creative, Inc. and L Oreal USA, Inc.
Defendant: DANPING GONG and SALLEE INC.
Case Number: 2:2018cv10413
Filed: December 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: S James Otero
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2019 Filing 24 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc., upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon DANPING GONG - REGISTERED AGENT FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. AMENDED (Caplan, David)
February 14, 2019 Filing 23 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Sallee Inc. #20 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Proof of Service is lacking required information. Requesting party shall file a new Request/Application with noted deficiencies corrected in order to have default reconsidered. Sallee Inc. is a Corporation. Therefore service on "John Doe", partner with physical description, served under FRCP is insufficient. (lc)
February 14, 2019 Filing 22 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Danping Gong (lc)
February 13, 2019 Filing 21 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Danping Gong filed by Plaintiff L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc.. (Caplan, David)
February 13, 2019 Filing 20 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Sallee Inc. filed by Plaintiff L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc.. (Caplan, David)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge S. James Otero:Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause in writing by not later then February 19, 2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The court will consider the filing of the following as an appropriate response to this Order to Show Cause, on or before the above date: Answer by the Defendant(s) or Plaintiff's request for entry of default. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc)
January 18, 2019 Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #16 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect selection of system statute prompt as FRCP 5(b)(2)(D). Service of Process was Not made on Clerks Office of USDC. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (lc)
January 16, 2019 Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc., upon Defendant Danping Gong served on 1/8/2019, answer due 1/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon JOHN DOE "REFUSED TO PROVIDE FULL NAME) PARTNER in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Caplan, David)
January 16, 2019 Filing 16 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc., upon Defendant Sallee Inc. served on 1/8/2019, answer due 1/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Caplan, David)
January 3, 2019 Filing 15 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Sallee Inc. (lc)
January 2, 2019 Filing 14 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs L Oreal USA Creative, Inc., L Oreal USA, Inc.. (Caplan, David)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa Pearson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC and designating David Caplan as local counsel #8 by Judge S. James Otero. (lc)
December 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
December 19, 2018 Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Danping Gong. (ghap)
December 19, 2018 Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
December 19, 2018 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (ghap)
December 17, 2018 Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa Pearson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 12/17/2018, Receipt No. 26E5SNSJ) filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa Pearson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22906236) #6 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 5-4.3.4 Application not hand-signed. Other error(s) with document(s): Local counsel failed to sign application.. (lt)
December 17, 2018 Filing 6 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lisa Pearson to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-22906236) filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC., (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Caplan, David)
December 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22905469 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC., L'OREAL USA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10) (Attorney David K Caplan added to party L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC.(pty:pla), Attorney David K Caplan added to party L'OREAL USA, INC.(pty:pla))(Caplan, David)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: L Oreal USA Creative, Inc. et al v. Sallee Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DANPING GONG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SALLEE INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L'OREAL USA CREATIVE, INC.
Represented By: David K Caplan
Represented By: Lisa Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L'OREAL USA, INC.
Represented By: David K Caplan
Represented By: Lisa Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L Oreal USA Creative, Inc.
Represented By: Lisa Pearson
Represented By: David K Caplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L Oreal USA, Inc.
Represented By: Lisa Pearson
Represented By: David K Caplan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?