Cynthia T. Fortune v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Cynthia T. Fortune
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2018cv10422
Filed: December 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John D Early
Referring Judge: R Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2019 Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune. (Drake, Erika)
January 20, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 1/18/2019, answer due 3/19/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by unspecified means. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certified Mail Proof)(Drake, Erika)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal. (mba)
December 19, 2018 Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (mba)
December 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, GRANTING #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (mba)
December 19, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (jtil)
December 17, 2018 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune, (Drake, Erika)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune. (Drake, Erika)
December 17, 2018 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune. (Drake, Erika)
December 17, 2018 Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune. (Drake, Erika)
December 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by plaintiff Cynthia T. Fortune. (Attorney Erika Bailey Drake added to party Cynthia T. Fortune(pty:pla))(Drake, Erika)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cynthia T. Fortune v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia T. Fortune
Represented By: Erika Bailey Drake
Represented By: Roger David Drake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?