ALO, LLC v. Reflex Performance Resources, Inc.
| ALO, LLC |
| Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. DBA 90 Degree by Reflex, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. and Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. a New York Corporation doing business as 90 Degree by Reflex |
| 2:2018cv10491 |
| December 18, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| S James Otero |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. answer now due 2/22/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Reflex Performance Resources, Inc..(Attorney K Tom Kohan added to party Reflex Performance Resources, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kohan, K) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ALO, LLC, upon Defendant Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. served on 1/4/2019, answer due 1/25/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon LEON HEDVAT, Chief Executive Officer, Person Authorized to Accept Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holland, Andrew) |
Filing 11
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 10 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by ALO, LLC. (Holland, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff ALO, LLC, identifying Marco DeGeorge; Daniel Harris; Color Image Apparel, Inc.. (Holland, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by ALO, LLC. (Holland, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. The Civil Cover Sheet should have been filed under a separate event, not as an attachment to the complaint: Civil Events>Other Filings>Miscellaneous Filings>Civil Cover Sheet CV-71. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Reflex Performance Resources, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff ALO, LLC. (Holland, Andrew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22918129 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff ALO, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Andrew P Holland added to party ALO, LLC(pty:pla))(Holland, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
