Sentinel Insurance Company v. Brasscraft, et al
Plaintiff: Sentinel Insurance Company
Defendant: Brasscraft Manufacturing Company, Brasscraft and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Case Number: 2:2018cv10507
Filed: December 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: R Gary Klausner
Referring Judge: Alicia G Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS PRIVATE NUISANCE CAUSE OF ACTION FROM SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY'S COMPLAINT #13 by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp)
January 23, 2019 Filing 15 Text Only Entry: Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.4.2, counsel for defendant shall immediately submit the proposed order in connection with Docket Entry 13 (to the Judge's generic email address) in Word or Word Perfect format. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
January 22, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Withdrawal filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Certificate of Service)(Uffenheimer, Maya)
January 22, 2019 Filing 13 STIPULATION to Strike filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Declaration Certificate of Service)(Uffenheimer, Maya)
January 14, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Non-Opposition filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Certificate of Service)(Uffenheimer, Maya)
January 2, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Adam Michael Romney on behalf of Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company (Romney, Adam)
December 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company's Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12 (b)(6) #8 , noticed for hearing on 03/18/2019 at 9:00 am, HAS BEEN ADVANCED TO 01/28/2019 at 9:00 am. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
December 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for April 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/15/2019. (pg)
December 27, 2018 Filing 8 [WITHDRAWN PURSUANT TO DOCKET ENTRY #14] NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Under Rule 12 (b)(6) filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. Motion set for hearing on 3/18/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge R. Gary Klausner. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Declaration Certificate of Service) (Uffenheimer, Maya) Modified on 1/23/2019 (bp).
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES upon filing of the complaint by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (pg)
December 20, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
December 20, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (esa)
December 19, 2018 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Brasscraft, Does 1 through 25, inclusive, filed by plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company. (Filed in state court 11/15/18, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)
December 19, 2018 COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiff Sentinel Insurance Company, upon Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company served on 11/26/2018. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service, by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 6) (esa)
December 19, 2018 COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 7)(esa)
December 19, 2018 Filing 4 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Maya C Uffenheimer counsel for Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. Adding Maya C. Uffenheimer as counsel of record for Brasscraft Manufacturing Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Attorney Maya C Uffenheimer added to party Brasscraft Manufacturing Company(pty:dft))(Uffenheimer, Maya)
December 19, 2018 Filing 3 Brasscraft Manufacturing Company CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company, identifying Masco Corporation. (Schick, Malcolm)
December 19, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Schick, Malcolm)
December 19, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18STCV05229 Receipt No: 0973-22921534 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Brasscraft Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A-Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B-Ntc of Case Assignment, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C-CT SOS, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-CA SOS, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E-MI SOS, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F-Service of Process Transmittal, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G-Answer) (Attorney Malcolm D Schick added to party Brasscraft Manufacturing Company(pty:dft))(Schick, Malcolm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sentinel Insurance Company v. Brasscraft, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sentinel Insurance Company
Represented By: Adam Michael Romney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brasscraft Manufacturing Company
Represented By: Malcolm D Schick
Represented By: Maya C Uffenheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brasscraft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?