Pedro Jimenez v. Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc. et al
| Pedro Jimenez |
| Does 1 through 10 inclusive, Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc., Kwak Family 2010 Trust and Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc. doing business as Sizzler Western |
| 2:2018cv10535 |
| December 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, (lc)
|
| Filing 6 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Kwak Family 2010 Trust, Sizzler USA Restaurants, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (et) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pedro Jimenez, (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Pedro Jimenez. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Pedro Jimenez. (Hong, Kevin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22926503 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Pedro Jimenez. (Attorney Kevin Hyunjong Hong added to party Pedro Jimenez(pty:pla))(Hong, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
