Moises Reynoso v. Sphinx Smoke and Vape Shop et al
| MOISES REYNOSO |
| DOES 1 through 10, SPHINX SMOKE & VAPE SHOP, FIRST CALIFORNIA INVESTMENT LLC and Sphinx Smoke and Vape Shop |
| 2:2018cv10570 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants First California Investment LLC, Sphinx Smoke and Vape Shop. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff MOISES REYNOSO, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff MOISES REYNOSO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff MOISES REYNOSO. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22934028 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff MOISES REYNOSO. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party MOISES REYNOSO(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
