Maria Garcia v. City of San Fernando et al
| Ms. Maria Garcia |
| City of San Fernando, San Fernando Police Department, Police Chief Anthony Vairo, DOES 1-100, inclusive,, Officer Marc Boskovich, Does 1-100, Inclusive and Police Officer Marc Boskovich |
| 2:2018cv10629 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #7 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Civil Events - select - Service Waivers of Summon and Complaint - select - Summons Request for the Clerk to Issue the Summons. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (shb) |
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400 paid on 12/26/2018, receipt number 26EB4HPS), filed by Plaintiff Maria Garcia.(McElfish, Raymond) |
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, Attachment # 2 Summons and Attachment # 3 Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 12/26/2018, receipt number 26EB4HPS), filed by plaintiff Maria Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons in a Civil Action, #3 Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Raymond D McElfish added to party Maria Garcia(pty:pla))(McElfish, Raymond) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
