Marlene Navarro v. United States of America
| Marlene Navarro |
| United States of America |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, |
| 2:2018cv10640 |
| December 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Manuel L Real |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marlene Navarro, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by delivering a copy to Unknown. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Unknown. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Letter Certified Mail)(Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Marlene Navarro, upon Defendant United States of America served on 1/10/2019, answer due 3/11/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Flabia De La Rosa. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by unspecified means. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Stay Case pending THE LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS; Declaration of Matthew J. Barragan filed by Defendant United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Attorney Matthew Jimenez Barragan added to party United States of America(pty:dft)) (Barragan, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marlene Navarro. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Marlene Navarro. (Karlin, Marc) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71)is missing or incomplete. All civil actions presented for filing must be accompanied by a completed Civil Cover Sheet. See Local Rule 3-1. Counsel must file a completed Civil Cover Sheet immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Attachment # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, Attachment # 2 Exhibit Notice of Interested Parties and Attachment # 3 Exhibit Summons should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 3 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant United States of America. (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Manuel L. Real and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (et) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22949313 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Marlene Navarro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Notice of Interested Parties, #3 Exhibit Summons) (Attorney Marc A Karlin added to party Marlene Navarro (pty:bkmov))(Karlin, Marc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
