Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Sevan Nahabedian et al
| Jose Hernandez-Cruz |
| Jin Sung Chang, Does 1 through 10, Sevan Nahabedian and Sevan Nahabedian doing business as Larchmont Cleaners |
| 2:2018cv10661 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| S James Otero |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Jin Sung Chang, Sevan Nahabedian. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge S. James Otero and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ, (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ. (Kim, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22954346 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ. (Attorney Jason J Kim added to party JOSE HERNANDEZ-CRUZ(pty:pla))(Kim, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
