Marquise D. Charles v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Marquise D Charles and Marquise D. Charles
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Case Number: 2:2018cv10663
Filed: December 27, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Maria A Audero
Referring Judge: Michael W Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 15, 2019 Filing 9 STATUS REPORT of Rule 26(f) Report filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Sched of Pretrial and Trial Dates Worksheet)(Rapoport, Gregg)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (lom)
January 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for March 4, 2019 at 11:00 am. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
January 3, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) and Affirmative Defenses, filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.(Rapoport, Gregg)
December 28, 2018 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
December 28, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (ghap)
December 27, 2018 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF SMALL CLAIMS COURT COMPLAINT against Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC., filed by plaintiff Marquise D. Charles. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/21/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
December 27, 2018 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES-FILED as CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Notice of Interested Parties) filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC identifying ERC Holdings, LLC as Corporate Parent. (Rapoport, Gregg) Modified on 12/28/2018 (ghap).
December 27, 2018 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Rapoport, Gregg)
December 27, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 18IWSC03769 Receipt No: 0973-22954798 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Attorney Gregg A Rapoport added to party Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC(pty:dft))(Rapoport, Gregg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marquise D. Charles v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Represented By: Gregg A Rapoport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquise D Charles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marquise D. Charles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?