Debra J. Crisp-Stoot v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Debra J. Crisp-Stoot |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,, Does 1 through 50, inclusive and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2018cv10694 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Dkt. No. 12] is continued from March 4, 2019 to March 18, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 NOTICE PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO REMAND; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES filed by Plaintiff Debra J. Crisp-Stoot. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Plaintiff's Declaration in Support of Motion to Remand)(Giannamore, Mark) Modified on 1/30/2019 (bm). |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re Order to Show Cause re: procedural defect in removal by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Plaintiffs must move to remand within 30 days of the filing of the notice of removal if the defect in the notice of removal is procedural and they object. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). As this case was removed to federal court on December 27, 2018, Plaintiff must move to remand no later than January 28, 20191 or this potential defect is waived. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 10 AMENDED CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. (Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 8/5/2019 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Conformed Answer re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Conformed Answer)(Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (ghap) |
| NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 3 page 13) (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Debra J. Crisp-Stoot. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 4/23/2018 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT 1 page 6) (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,, (Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of State Court re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),, #1 (Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,. (Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number MC027916 Receipt No: 0973-22959630 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #9 Declaration Dec of RWO) (Attorney Raena Elizabeth Walker Ohiri added to party Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,(pty:dft))(Ohiri, Raena Elizabeth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
