Joseph Chatman v. San Dimas Police Department et al
| Joseph Chatman |
| Chief of Police City of Glendale, Unknown No. 1, San Dimas Police Department, Unknown No. 2, Chief of Police City of San Dimas, Unknown No 3, Unknown No. 4, City of San Dimas and City of Glendale |
| 2:2018cv10712 |
| December 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Steve Kim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: WAIVER OF INITIAL FILING FEE by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. Plaintiff's motion to have the initial filing fee waived (see ECF #14 ), is granted. (hr)
|
| Filing 13 Text Only Entry. Two (2) USM-285s, Summonses, and Complaint as to Chief of Police City of San Dimas, official and individual capacity, forwarded to the United States Marshal for service of process. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (clee) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Waiver of Fee filed by Plaintiff Joseph Chatman. (hr) |
| Filing 12 Request for Court Fee Waiver filed by Plaintiff Joseph Chatman. (clee) |
| Filing 11 Text Only Entry. Two (2) USM-285s, Summonses, and Complaint as to Chief of Police City of Glendale, official and individual capacity, forwarded to the United States Marshal for service of process. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (clee) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME #9 by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. On January 30, 2019, Plaintiff submitted an ex pate application for an extension of time in which to pay $3.72 in regards to proceed without prepayment of filings fees. Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: Plaintiff deadline to submit payment of $3.72 is extended thirty days, from February 9, up to and including March 11, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (clee)
|
| Filing 9 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time filed by Plaintiff Joseph Chatman. (clee) |
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendants Chief of Police of City of San Dimas, Chief of Police of City of Glendale, City of San Dimas, City of Glendale. (clee) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE SERVICE OF PROCESS by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)
|
|
Filing 5
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (Attachments: #1 Consent CV-11) (clee)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES #2 by Judge Steve Kim. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $3.72 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (clee)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Joseph Chatman. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Joseph Chatman against All Defendants, pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
