Nirvana L.L.C. v. Mark Jacobs International L.L.C. et al
Nirvana L.L.C. |
Does 1-10, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Mark Jacobs International L.L.C., Saks Incorporated, Saks Fifth Avenue, Does 1 through 10, Marc Jacobs International LLC and Saks Incorporated a Tennessee Corporation doing business as Saks Fifth Avenue |
2:2018cv10743 |
December 28, 2018 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
John A Kronstadt |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Whitney M. Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Saks Incorporated (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23258172) filed by defendants Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Saks Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brenner, Lee) |
Filing 19 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Michael J. Zinna to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendants Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Saks Incorporated (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23231594) filed by defendants Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Saks Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Brenner, Lee) |
Filing 18 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants Saks Incorporated, Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C..(Attorney Lee S Brenner added to party Marc Jacobs International LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Lee S Brenner added to party Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C.(pty:dft), Attorney Lee S Brenner added to party Saks Incorporated(pty:dft))(Brenner, Lee) |
Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C., upon Defendant Saks Incorporated served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Saks Incorporated d/b/a Saks Fifth Avenue in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C., upon Defendant Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C. served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C., upon Defendant Marc Jacobs International LLC served on 1/16/2019, answer due 2/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Marc Jacobs International L.L.C. in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Marc Jacobs International LLC, Neiman Marcus Group Limited, L.L.C., Saks Incorporated. (bp) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT. (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS) (bp) |
Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C.. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C.. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #4 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #6 , Summons Request #3 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #7 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Report on Filing of Copyright Action (Initial Notification) #5 (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The name and address of the attorney for plaintiff(s)must be entered in the appropriate field. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (ghap) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Amended filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C. identifying None as Corporate Parent. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Nirvana L.L.C.. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C., identifying None. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C.. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C.. (Lee, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22967969 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Nirvana L.L.C.. (Attorney Mark Steven Lee added to party Nirvana L.L.C.(pty:pla))(Lee, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.